Rank: Newbie
Joined: 11/4/2013(UTC)
Posts: 1,654
Location: Littleton
|
...and by now, I think experienced foosers will stop thinking, "Who's this Dustin guy?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/28/2013(UTC)
Posts: 1,087
|
Originally Posted by: SupaStar  One quick comment from me about the "waiting".
When you have sandbaggers playing in every event, they tend to clog up the brackets and hold everything and everyone else up. There were a handful of people that killed the tourney from running quicker due to going deep in every bracket. Then, there was a lot of issues with getting people to turn their results in. If we don't get results, we can't move forward.
Agreed. What can you do when players aren't getting to their tables, players aren't putting opponents on recall, and results aren't being entered quickly. You can't make the system idiot proof. Plus then you have great players excelling in everything... You would run into the same problems no matter what overhauls were made. I thought the weekend ran great for the most part. Just a couple more tweaks maybe. X |
"When I get to the table, that person, I don't care who they are, they're my mortal enemy. I hate them. " - John Grizzly |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 10/29/2013(UTC)
Posts: 0
|
Originally Posted by: SupaStar One suggestion for things to run smoother is do a no conflict tourney like Texas State and Nebraska did this year. Seems to work out really well.
For those who did not attend, they would have 3 events start at the same time but you could only play in one. For instance, PS, AD and lets say WD all started at 1pm sat. If youre an AM or women, you have to choose what you want to play. Obviously, you pick theone you havethe best chance in. Keeps things to a minimum but everything runs much smoother that way.
Something to consider for next year. Especially if we have close to 300 people again.
Dana Agree, We need this at a minimum for next year. I'd be willing to be more aggressive in the format changes than TX was. Edited by user Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:49:29 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 10/28/2013(UTC)
Posts: 0
Location: Denver
|
The event that caused some down time made for a pretty cool pic. -p 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 10/28/2013(UTC)
Posts: 2,105
Location: Colorado
|
That pic reminds me that from a fan's viewing standpoint, pun intended, the bleachers needed to be on an elevated platform so that you didn't have to stand to watch matches. The first two levels at least were lower than table level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 11/2/2013(UTC)
Posts: 0
Location: Albuquerque NM
|
Originally Posted by: FooserX How about The Law and Krause dipping for PD! CO can claim those two.
I didn't even see that.
They beat a smoking hot Knapton, Sprouse, Harvey, then dipped Walker...
That event was stacked. Nice work guys
Thanks X, pro is always super -strong in denver, has been for a very long time. This win is one of my best alltime. It ain't easy to get a title at this awesome event. So many tuff pro teams.Hays and shaw are seasoned pros. KW is a master with pro points. Grouse held me up and let me play thru my ruts which gave me time to show up and do my thang! Thanks for all the support colo. . .I always feel at home in colo, I have always had much love and respect for the foose family in colo. Can't wait to get back to denver!
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Important Information:
The foosball uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
More Details
Close
